Loading game details, prices and reviews...
Digital Arrow / Oct 31, 2011 / Indie, Racing
0 playing now
CompareA minimalistic sci-fi platform racing game that challenges the players to think in both horizontal and vertical perspectives.
| Part | Your PC | MinimumNot sure |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Not set | Intel or AMD Single-Core Processor (2,5 GHz) Can't tell |
| GPU | Not set | ATI X1900 or nVidia 8800 GTX with 512 MB RAM Can't tell |
| RAM | Not set | 2 GB Can't tell |
Mostly Positive
70% positive, 131 reviews
This game makes you feel like a parkour "Runner of the Future". So far, so good. And then you miss a platform and become a parkour "Runner of the Past".
23 found this helpful, 2026-05-30
You run... you jump.. you shoot... you wall jump... you... do a lot of things in this game... its part racer, part platformer all... abstact awesome coolness as you race through landscapes that are once at home in the mind's eye as in grand old imagination land no texture edition. The tunes that accompany you seem quite well suited for the game as well. Just try it out, it's pretty fun both by yourself and with...
53 found this helpful, 2016-01-15
Dash through the levels like a maniac and beat your friend's highscore then your highscore then become the ancient wizard. Very challenging especially on some levels. Controls need a bit of tweaking (unusual button layout). You can wall jump and shoot switches to open new paths. While speedrunning you collect orbs of wisdom which will come in handy in the future (not really). Visuals are basic because it's all about...
16 found this helpful, 2025-06-19
I really enjoyed my time with this game, but now that I'm at the point where I'm no longer likely to spend any more time with it I find myself being disappointed. Let me explain. This game handles speed really well and pulling off a flawless run feels great. There's a decent amount of content to keep you occupied, and there are some pretty well designed levels that are fun to play over and over. The core mechanics...
25 found this helpful, 2014-02-10
Parcour game that focuses on wall jumping. The colours are weird, and the environment is very abstract. This is a first impression review. In inMomentum you have to race through a series of waypoints to the end, without falling down. You can jump up on any vertical surface to get a boost, so the routes can vastly differ in efficiency. Gonna cut straight to the point: I'm not into speedrunners, and I don't really...
11 found this helpful, 2023-07-22
inMomentum is a fast-paced running game. Speed and reflex is everything. A great game to train one’s muscle memory and coordination. Also a major achievement in gameplay. It deserves a special place in every FPS gamer’s heart.
9 found this helpful, 2013-08-04
This game is good for a VERY specific type of person who loves speed-runner parkour platformers. I don't. There is not much to see. Very niche game, and with keyboard and mouse it's very hard to play.
2 found this helpful, 2026-01-28
There's a neat concept here, but sadly no content to use it on. The game has a very limited stock level set, unfulfilled promises of a level editor, and absolutely barren multiplayer servers. At the end of the day, even with its intriguing visual style and gameplay concept, it's just not worth it.
32 found this helpful, 2013-12-08
This game is really good looking! Levels are beatiful and graphics are very fine. Music is great. Gets very difficult so maybe not best game for casual playing, but easier levels are much fun. One bad thing is that controls are not always working like they should be so you can fail because of it.
5 found this helpful, 2016-12-24
Yes. inMomentum has its issues. Certain same-facing walls will count as one wall for the purposes of wall-jumping, some rare collision boxes are just slightly off enough for you to slam into the corner of them, and the multiplayer is essentially dead. The game is abandoned, these issues won't be fixed, and no new levels will be added (barring intervention by a tech wizard who can reverse engineer an SDK for the...
3 found this helpful, 2019-09-05